ClickCease
guardianship, Nevada, estate planning, probate

The Risks of Guardianship

Various media outlets in Las Vegas have recently reported on extensive problems with the guardianship system in Southern Nevada. In a most dramatic example of the guardianship system being abused, a private, professional guardian has been accused of improperly taking more than $495,000 from a Las Vegas woman who was under guardianship. This dramatic example of abuse is extremely distressing. However, for most Southern Nevadans the risks of guardianship are not quite as dramatic, but are, nevertheless, still real. Here are some of these risks and how you can protect yourself.

 

What is Guardianship? 

A guardianship generally arises when an adult is not able to manage his own finances or personal matters or is not able to make health care decisions for himself1)Guardianships of minor children may also occur, but I will not discuss guardianships for minors in this article. In such circumstances, Nevada law is very broad, allowing “any interested person” to petition the Guardianship Court to be appointed as the guardian of the “ward” 2)meaning, the person who is in need of guardianship, See NRS 159.044. Interestingly, the Nevada guardianship statutes do not provide any further definition of who is an “interested person”. For all practical purposes, the Guardianship Court has allowed essentially anyone who says they are an interested person to be appointed as a guardian, even if the “interested person” is not related to the ward in any way and even if the “interested person” has never met the ward prior to asking for appointment as the guardian. So long as the interested person can establish that the ward needs guardianship, the Guardianship Court will generally appoint that interested person as guardian of the ward.

 

The Risks of Guardianship 

Once a guardian is appointed, the ward is declared legally incompetent and, thus, loses control of his own decisions. In essence, the guardian is authorized to make all decisions for the ward, including decisions on where to obtain health care, where the ward’s money is invested, whether to sell the ward’s house, where the ward will live, and what the ward can do with his free time. In best case scenarios, the guardian will act more as a mentor and counselor to the ward in making these decisions and will follow the ward’s directions on these decisions to the greatest extent possible. In the worst case scenarios, the guardian runs the ward’s life with no regard for the ward’s own choices.

Nevada law allows the guardian to be paid “reasonable compensation” for the guardian’s services 3)NRS 159.183. It is very important to know that the guardian’s compensation is paid from the ward’s own money, not by the State or County. Similarly, the guardian is entitled to hire an attorney and other professionals to provide their professional services to the guardian. Again, the fees and costs of the attorneys and other professionals are paid from the ward’s own money, not by the State or County. It is commonplace to see combined guardian fees and attorney fees to exceed $10,000 for very routine guardianship matters. In difficult or disputed guardianship matters, these fees can total tens of thousands of dollars.

 

Protect Yourself from Guardianship 

The most simple and effective way to protect yourself from guardianship is to sign power of attorney documents for both financial/general matters and also for health care decisions. Power of attorney documents allow you to decide who you would want to help you manage your financial and general matters and to make health care decisions for you if you were not able to do so. Appointing an agent under a power of attorney performs all of the functions that a court-appointed guardian would perform without the expense and loss of independence that occurs in guardianship. Power of attorney forms can be created relatively inexpensively by experienced estate planning attorneys, so do not leave this to chance by using the fill-in-the-blank forms that are often full of mistakes that render them invalid and unusable.

A revocable living trust is also an important tool to avoid the need for guardianship court. When you create a revocable living trust, your assets are transferred into your trust and are held and used according to the terms that you set up when you create your trust. Such assets in a trust should not require any court intervention or oversight in order for the assets to be used for your benefit. In addition, thoughtful estate planning attorneys can include provisions in the trust that protect you from the risks of the guardianship system and prepare the trust in a way that keeps your assets out of guardianship.

Most importantly, though, is advice that is not legal advice, but the best practical advice you can use to avoid the risks of guardianship. Many elderly people retire in Southern Nevada without any family members who live in Southern Nevada. These retirees are particularly vulnerable to being caught in the guardianship system.

It is crucial for these retirees to be involved in their neighborhood and communities and make friendships and connections that will be able to protect them if the need arises. Make your neighbors aware of how they can contact your family if you are at risk for whatever reason. Be involved in your local church, charity, homeowners association, or senior center. Make sure that your primary care physician and any other doctors that you visit on a regular basis have a copy of your healthcare power of attorney or that they at least have the contact information for whomever it is that you trust most to take care of you if you cannot take care of yourself. Guardianship abuses arise most often when true “interested persons” (children, siblings, friends, etc.) cannot be located or have no idea that you are at risk, thus leaving the potential ward to the whims of an “interested person” who has no interest in you other than as another billable unit in their professional guardianship service.

Footnotes

Footnotes
1 Guardianships of minor children may also occur, but I will not discuss guardianships for minors in this article
2 meaning, the person who is in need of guardianship, See NRS 159.044
3 NRS 159.183
sports book investing, sports betting

Sports Book Investing? Is There a Catch?

Sports betting1)Remember kids, only gamble with money you can afford to lose, and by kids I mean folks at least twenty-one years old continues to grow in popularity ever year.  This could be due to a number of factors. With technology now, it is possible to watch a telecast of almost any game imaginable.  Additionally, with the internet becoming faster and more ubiquitous with each passing year, it has become easier and easier to bet on sports.  For example, in a ten year period starting in 1994, the amount bet on the Football Championship2)the name of the event is protected by copyright law  doubled to almost 120 million dollars3) Click here to see the chart.  Nevada, through her legislators, has the foresight to see this as a long term trend, and in turn, passed significant legislation during the 2015 legislative session to put the state in the forefront of this growing industry.

Now I will tell you a bit about Senate Bill (SB) 443 that legalizes sports book investing.

 

Sports Book Investing and the Text of SB 443

Before getting into the specifics of the bill, I think it is worth taking a look at Section 2 of the bill that states the purpose and intent of the new law:

  1. The State of Nevada leads the nation in the regulation and enforcement of race book and sports pool wagers, such that the State is uniquely positioned to expand the means for natural persons to place race book and sports pool wagers in a controlled environment.

  2. Allowing natural persons to pool money in a business entity which can then place race book and sports pool wagers with nonrestricted gaming licensees will increase wagering activity in this State.

  3. A comprehensive registration of business entities that place race book and sports pool wagers will provide greater transparency for nonrestricted gaming licensees, prevent fraud and assist law enforcement agencies in this State.

 

The issue with offshore sports betting4)that is most of the betting people do now on the internet, which is illegal by the way is that you have no assurances that the offshore entity will pay you 5)just because they show a credit in your online account does not mean they will send you a check, and there is no telling who is profiting off of the VIG 6)the amount 10% or so that the book collects on each bet, for example when you bet most any sport on an even line, the odds are -110, meaning you have to bet $11 dollars to make $10.  That extra dollar is the VIG.  The advantage of legalized wagering in Nevada (besides the 100,000+ of jobs the casino industry supports) is that the companies have to file disclosures with the SEC, and the casinos are regulated sufficiently to guarantee that you will be paid on a winning sports (or other) bets.  Betting through a bookie or offshore is completely unregulated and provides no American jobs.  The legislature is admirable for attempting to take some of the illegal sports betting market share and have the money invested in our economy.

 

What the New Sports Book Investing Law Permits

Section 3 of SB 443 allows a “business entity,” once registered with the Gaming Control Board and after payment of the $1,000 registration fee7)with $500 due each of the following years to place wagers on sporting events.  Once registered with the Secretary of State, the business entity will operate in a similar manner to a mutual fund, where folks can invest with a company they believe in, and these companies will make the best wagers they can8)similar to hedge fund investing, except there are no dark pools or flash trading.  The books will still have the option to accept only the bets they want to accept.  I imagine, similar to investment funds, people will evaluate past performance and pick the fund that will make them the most amount of money.9)this may be a faulty assumption

We will have to wait and see if the larger casinos will be risk averse toward these funds, but my hunch is, given the competition for gaming dollars, they will eventually be pushed into raising their wagering caps.

 

Footnotes

Footnotes
1 Remember kids, only gamble with money you can afford to lose, and by kids I mean folks at least twenty-one years old
2 the name of the event is protected by copyright law
3  Click here to see the chart
4 that is most of the betting people do now on the internet, which is illegal by the way
5 just because they show a credit in your online account does not mean they will send you a check
6 the amount 10% or so that the book collects on each bet, for example when you bet most any sport on an even line, the odds are -110, meaning you have to bet $11 dollars to make $10.  That extra dollar is the VIG
7 with $500 due each of the following years
8 similar to hedge fund investing, except there are no dark pools or flash trading
9 this may be a faulty assumption
probate, estate planning

What Are Probate Assets?

After a love one has passed away, one item that most people do not want to think about is probate, but undoubtedly it may be one of the first things on his or her mind.

One important question regarding probate is: what is a probate asset? Or, What assets are included in the probate estate?

Assets belonging to an individual when he or she dies can be titled in a variety of ways. The characterization of the assets will determine if the assets will need to be included in probate or if it will be excluded from probate administration.

 

Decedent’s Name in Probate

All assets that are titled in the name of the decedent only will be included as a probate asset. For example, if the decedent, Joe Smith, dies leaving a bank account that is titled as “Joe Smith” this account is an estate asset. In order for the bank to release the contents of the account to the heirs or beneficiaries of the estate, the bank will require an order signed by the court that specifically designates who has the authority to collect the funds.

The same rules apply for real property that is titled in the name of the decedent at the time of his passing. By way of example, if Joe Smith dies owning real property and the property is titled as “Joe Smith,” then the real property would be an asset of the estate and county recorder and assessor would need an order signed by the court that designates who is to receive the property or an order that authorizes the sale of the property.

 

Designated Beneficiaries

Most financial accounts allow for the owner of the account to list or designate a pay on death beneficiary (POD) or a transfer upon death beneficiary (TOD). If the designation is completed prior to the decedent’s death and while the decedent has his mental capacity1)among other conditions, then the asset will pass to the beneficiaries listed and will not be subject to the probate estate or the court’s jurisdiction.

 

Joint Ownership

Jointly owed accounts will become the sole property of the surviving joint owner. Many financial accounts and real property are owned as joint tenants with the decedent’s significant other or a business partner. By operation of law, the survivor of the joint owners will have complete control and ownership of the asset at the time of the decedent’s death. The asset will pass to the survivor and would do so outside of the probate estate.

For example, if Joe Smith owned his home with his wife Jane Smith and the title of the home was Joe Smith and Jane Smith as joint tenants, then at the time of Joe Smith’s passing, Jane Smith would be the sole owner of the property. Joe Smith’s interest in the property would not be subject to the probate estate.

 

Footnotes

Footnotes
1 among other conditions
personal injury lawyer, attorney, nevada

Should I Hire a Personal Injury Lawyer? 

 

If you have been in an automobile accident that was not your fault, some people and lawyers may tell you to hire a personal injury lawyer immediately no matter what. In fact, there are some circumstances you may be better off not hiring an attorney.

 

Reasons to hire a personal injury lawyer

  • You are injured, and;
  • You would like guidance and representation in dealing with the insurance carrier,
  • You lack experience and knowledge of how to make and pursue an insurance claim,
  • An insurance adjuster is aggressive or overly persistent about getting you to sign a document and you are unsure or uncomfortable,
  • An insurance company or adjuster is asking for your recorded or written statement,
  • You are not confident or satisfied that you have or will get a fair offer from an insurance carrier,
  • You are concerned that you may not be able to get the medical treatment you may need,
  • The medical providers through your health insurance plan are not quickly getting you the treatment or referrals you need,1)anything over a week during the first three months is concerning
  • The injuries are significant, such as extended hospital stays, required surgeries, or similar,
  • The accident involves a death, or it likely led to someone’s death.
  • You feel that you are being treated unfairly by the insurance company. Insurance companies exist to make money for its owners and shareholders, not to make you happy. They may aggressively obtain all information and try to settle out of a claim before you realize what is happening, or they may ignore you in hopes that you give up. An attorney can often help you by ameliorating these bad behaviors, and occasionally, you might be able to seek compensation from the insurance company for bad treatment of you above and beyond the underlying damages from the car accident.

If you are injured after an accident, one of the most important steps is to make sure that you quickly get evaluated and immediately follow the recommendations of your medical providers and doctors. Delays or gaps in treatment create suspicion that your complaints of pain are not related to the accident, or pain is not as bad as you claim. A personal injury attorney can make sure that you get the medical treatment you need, represent you in correspondence with the insurance company, seek a settlement, and file a lawsuit when needed.

 

Other reasons to hire an attorney

  • You appreciate what a good attorney can do for you and feel representation will increase the value of your claim.
  • You dislike the idea that the executives of insurance companies and the companies themselves will profit if you do not aggressively pursue your claim. The less they pay you, the more the companies can afford to give their executives large bonuses.

 

Reasons not to hire an attorney

  • You are not injured.
  • It was clearly and without question your fault.

Of course, your case may be different and you may wish to consult with an attorney with regards to whether you should retain an attorney. This is not legal advice.

At Clear Counsel Law Group, we are experienced in handling personal injury and car accident cases, please contact us for a free consultation.

 

Footnotes

Footnotes
1 anything over a week during the first three months is concerning
foreclosure mediation, mortgage, nevada, underwater home

Foreclosure Mediation in Nevada

Although the so-called “financial crisis” has passed in most states, Nevada home owners are still struggling1)this is not a conversation to assign blame, though with Dick Fuld coming back out from under his rock, it would not hurt, but today we speak of options for homeowners going forward.  In 2009, a foreclosure mediation program went into effect in Nevada, with encouraging results so far.  Nevada’s foreclosure mediation program accepted more than 4,200 mediations in its inaugural year of 20102)the statistics are reported yearly by the Nevada Foreclosure Mediation Program.  Each year referenced is the fiscal year, meaning for 2010, the data is from July 2009 through June 2010.  In 2011, the program reached its zenith with an astounding 7,424 foreclosure mediations, but even in fiscal year 2014, the program still processed more than 2,100 cases.

In this discussion, I hope to clarify what the foreclosure mediation process is through question and answer.

 

When does foreclosure mediation become an option for an underwater3)this term means the home is worth less than the amount still owed on the home homeowner?

Starting in 2009 with the creation of the foreclosure mediation program by the Nevada legislature, all homeowners in default became eligible for the mediation program.  The law has been updated to now default all homeowners into the foreclosure mediation program once the trustee files a notice of default.

The lender must include a foreclosure mediation enrollment form when sending the homeowner the notice of default.  The homeowner has 30 days to return the enrollment form to the foreclosure mediation program for non-judicial foreclosure, 20 days for judicial foreclosure4)non-judicial foreclosure is done out-of-court, more about the difference in foreclosure processes will be said in later entries.  Along with the form, the homeowner and lender are responsible for paying $200 each for the services of the mediator.

 

What happens next?

Within ten days of receipt of the enrollment forms and fees, the foreclosure mediation program will assign a mediator to the case.  By statute the program has 135 days to complete the mediation.

The mediator will then hold a document conference or call in order to discuss with the homeowner what documents are necessary for the mediation to go forward.  The lender or foreclosure trustee then has five days to mail or email5)if electronic communication is agreed to by the participants the document request to the mediator and homeowner.  In turn, the homeowner has fifteen days to return the requested documents in his or her possession to the lender6)s/he is also required start obtaining the documents s/he does not currently have. The lender/trustee has another fifteen days to review the received documents, and send a supplemental request, if necessary.

 

What is required of the lender?

The lender then must provide the following documentation to the mediator and the homeowner:

  1. The original mortgage note
  2. The original or certified copy of the deed of trust
  3. A copy of the assignment of either the note or deed of trust
  4. Proof that the party representing the lender at the mediation is empowered to modify the provisions of the home loan.
  5. An appraisal or Brokers Price Opinion of the home being foreclosed upon, not older than sixty days from the date of the mediation.

 

What are some other good facts to know?

  • Upon completion of the mediation, each party has the right to have a district court judge in the relevant jurisdiction review the outcome.  The appeal to the court must be filed within thirty days of receipt of the mediator’s summary of the proceedings7)the mediator’s statement must be completed within ten days of the mediation.
  • If the homeowner is in need an interpreter, one must be requested of the foreclosure mediation program within twenty-one days of the scheduled mediation.
  • Foreclosure mediation is unavailable to those opting to file bankruptcy.

 

Stay tuned for a discussion of the difference between judicial/non-judicial mediation, and the available options out there to avoid foreclosure.

Footnotes

Footnotes
1 this is not a conversation to assign blame, though with Dick Fuld coming back out from under his rock, it would not hurt, but today we speak of options for homeowners going forward
2 the statistics are reported yearly by the Nevada Foreclosure Mediation Program.  Each year referenced is the fiscal year, meaning for 2010, the data is from July 2009 through June 2010
3 this term means the home is worth less than the amount still owed on the home
4 non-judicial foreclosure is done out-of-court, more about the difference in foreclosure processes will be said in later entries
5 if electronic communication is agreed to by the participants
6 s/he is also required start obtaining the documents s/he does not currently have
7 the mediator’s statement must be completed within ten days of the mediation
civil forfeiture, nevada, police, 4th amendment

Civil Forfeiture in Nevada: What You Need to Know

Recently in the news here in Nevada was the acquittal of Steven Ficano; you may be familiar with his story as he is the elderly man arrested for possessing much more marijuana than legally permissible under the medical marijuana laws.  He was charged with possession, and possession with intent to sell; Mr. Ficano was acquitted by a jury from each charge.  However, along with marijuana, the police seized $51,000 in cash and twenty-six guns, which Mr. Ficano’s lawyer claims are antiques.

Given that Mr. Ficano was acquitted, it would be reasonable to assume that the government would return his cash and antique guns, but you may be surprised to know that this may not necessarily happen.1)for another example of what is called civil forfeiture in the news, look at this story of Tan Nguyen from Humboldt County, the sheriff’s deputies really turned public opinion against themselves by posing with the seized cash on facebook The Tan Nguyen case  As it turns out, there is not law in Nevada that determines what should happen to seized property if property owner is acquitted, at least not yet.

 

The civil forfeiture law currently

The Nevada forfeiture laws are located in chapter 179 of the Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS).   First, here is the law permitting law enforcement officials to seize property:

 

    NRS 179.1165  Seizure of property: Requirement of process.

      1.  Except as provided in subsection 2, property that is subject to forfeiture may only be seized by a law enforcement agency upon process issued by a magistrate having jurisdiction over the property.

      2.  A seizure of property may be made by a law enforcement agency without process if:

      (a) The seizure is incident to:

             (1) An arrest;

             (2) A search pursuant to a search warrant; or

             (3) An inspection pursuant to a warrant for an administrative inspection;

      (b) The property is the subject of a final judgment in a proceeding for forfeiture;

      (c) The law enforcement agency has probable cause to believe that the property is directly or indirectly dangerous to health or safety; or

      (d) The law enforcement agency has probable cause to believe that the property is subject to forfeiture.

      (Added to NRS by 1985, 1466; A 1987, 1382)

 

As you can see, all that is necessary is “probable cause” that the property will be “subject to forfeiture” or that the property is “directly or indirectly dangerous to health or safety.”  As in the case of Tan Nguyen, sufficient probable cause can be an officer claiming the smell of marijuana in the car 2)irrespective if there actually is any marijuana or marijuana smell in the car.

  

Is the civil forfeiture law about to be updated?

Senate Bill (SB) 138, currently working its way through the legislative process3)It has been unanimously approved by the assembly and the senate, it is currently awaiting a signature from Governor Sandoval.  In SB 138, the legislature requires police departments to report all forfeitures to the attorney general once a year, so we will now have an accounting of how much property is being seized each year.  Additionally, SB 138 addresses what should happen to seized property upon an acquittal.  Here is the current law:

      NRS 179.1173  Proceedings for forfeiture: Priority over other civil matters; motion to stay; standard of proof; conviction of claimant not required; confidentiality of informants; return of property to claimant.

      1.  The district court shall proceed as soon as practicable to a trial and determination of the matter. A proceeding for forfeiture is entitled to priority over other civil actions which are not otherwise entitled to priority.

      2.  At a proceeding for forfeiture, the plaintiff or claimant may file a motion for an order staying the proceeding and the court shall grant that motion if a criminal action which is the basis of the proceeding is pending trial. The court shall, upon a motion made by the plaintiff, lift the stay upon a satisfactory showing that the claimant is a fugitive.

      3.  The plaintiff in a proceeding for forfeiture must establish proof by clear and convincing evidence that the property is subject to forfeiture.

 

Below is the update to NRS 179.1173 that has been approve the by the Nevada state assembly and senate.  The strikethrough portions are the sections of the old law, deleted by the new one.  The underlined portions are the additions to the statute.

      NRS 179.1173

1.  [The] Except as otherwise provided in subsection 2, the district court shall proceed as soon as practicable to a trial and determination of the matter. A proceeding for forfeiture is entitled to priority over other civil actions which are not otherwise entitled to priority.

2.  At a proceeding for forfeiture, the [plaintiff or claimant may file a motion for] court shall issue an order staying the proceeding [and the court shall grant that motion if a] that remains in effect while the criminal action which is the basis of the proceeding is pending trial. The court shall [, upon a motion made by the plaintiff,] lift the stay [upon a satisfactory showing that the claimant is a fugitive.] after the trial is completed. If the claimant is acquitted during the trial, the property of the claimant must be returned to the claimant within 7 business days after the acquittal.

3.  If property has been seized and the criminal charges against the owner of such property are denied or dismissed, all such property must be returned to the owner within 7 business days after the criminal charges are denied or dismissed.

4.  The plaintiff in a proceeding for forfeiture must establish proof by clear and convincing evidence that the property is subject to forfeiture.

 

Note in subsection 2 that law enforcement will be required to return seized property after an acquittal within seven business days.  The same is true, as stated in subsection 3, for seized property when the criminal charges are dismissed.  Providing this guidance in the statute benefits the public and police departments.  As of 29 May, the bill has been delivered to the governor.  We will have to wait and see if he signs it into law.

For more information about civil forfeiture as a national problem, see New Yorker "Taken"

Footnotes

Footnotes
1 for another example of what is called civil forfeiture in the news, look at this story of Tan Nguyen from Humboldt County, the sheriff’s deputies really turned public opinion against themselves by posing with the seized cash on facebook The Tan Nguyen case
2 irrespective if there actually is any marijuana or marijuana smell in the car
3 It has been unanimously approved by the assembly and the senate, it is currently awaiting a signature from Governor Sandoval
bankruptcy, car, repossession

Can I get my car back after it has been repossessed if I file a chapter 7 bankruptcy?

It seems to be common knowledge that a repossessed vehicle can be recovered by a bankruptcy debtor when the debtor files a chapter 13 bankruptcy and the vehicle has not yet been sold by the repossessing creditor. However, it is a lesser known fact that the debtor may recover the repossessed vehicle in a chapter 7 bankruptcy. In order to understand how this process works, it is necessary to examine the interplay between a couple of sections of the United States Bankruptcy Code.

 

What the bankruptcy code states

Upon the filing of a debtor’s bankruptcy case, the automatic stay of 11 United States Code § 362(a) goes into effect regardless of the bankruptcy chapter under which the case is filed. Said automatic stay operates to prohibit any collection actions by creditors after a bankruptcy case is filed. It also prohibits creditors from exercising “control over property of the estate.” 1)See 11 USC § 362(a)(3). From this section it is clearly prohibited to collect, or even keep, property of the bankruptcy estate. The question then becomes whether or not a repossessed vehicle falls within the statutory definition of property of the bankruptcy estate.

Again, we must turn to the language of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code to answer this question. The United States Supreme Court has expressly recognized that the scope of the governing code section regarding this matter, 11 USC §541(a)(1), is broad and that it includes in the estate of the debtor any property made available to the estate by other provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. 2)United States v. Whiting Pools, 103 S.Ct. 2309, at 2313 (1983). In that case, the Supreme Court found that property of a bankruptcy estate includes collateral that has been repossessed pre-petition. Stated simply, the holding stands for the proposition that if a car is repossessed and in the hands of the creditor when the petition is filed, the person filing bankruptcy can still get the car back.

The Supreme Court noted specifically that §542(a) of the Bankruptcy Code is a provision that brings property into the bankruptcy estate that was not in the possession of the debtor at the time the bankruptcy proceeding was commenced. The court concluded that §542(a) does not require that the debtor hold a possessory interest in the property at the commencement of the proceedings.3)Id. at 2314.

Under 11 U.S.C. §542(a), if a car is in the possession of a creditor after a repo, the debtor may compel the creditor to return possession of the property. Section 541(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code sets forth that the commencement of a case under any chapter creates the bankruptcy estate, and that estate of the debtor includes "all legal and equitable interests of the debtor in property, wherever located or by whomever held, as of the commencement of the case," with the exception of the provisions contained in §541(b) and (c)(2). Once the vehicle is sold at auction by the creditor, however, the debtor’s legal and equitable interests are extinguished and the vehicle is beyond the far reaching grasp of the Bankruptcy Code.

From a practical standpoint, there is usually little sense in pursuing a repossessed vehicle if the debtor is filing a Chapter 7 bankruptcy because, in order to keep the car long term, the debtor would have to return to good standing with the creditor. Most chapter 7 debtors are simply unable to cure the arrears4)owed money that have accrued under the loan and are simply looking at the vehicle being repossessed once the bankruptcy has been completed, or the automatic stay being terminated upon request of the creditor.

However, if it is the debtor’s intent to redeem the vehicle under §722 of the Bankruptcy Code, the secured creditor must accept a payoff of their loan at the current value of the vehicle. Many debtors are able to secure financing from a third party lender to acquire the funds necessary for the payoff of the old loan. In this scenario, the creditor’s claim is satisfied in full under the law. Refusal of the creditor to return the vehicle to a debtor seeking to redeem his or her vehicle in a Chapter 7 bankruptcy is a clear violation of §362(a)(3), and impedes the debtor’s legal right to redeem the vehicle.

Footnotes

Footnotes
1 See 11 USC § 362(a)(3
2 United States v. Whiting Pools, 103 S.Ct. 2309, at 2313 (1983
3 Id. at 2314.
4 owed money
service animals, ADA, service dog

Air Travel and Service Animals: What You Need to Know Before You Travel

Welcome to Part IV of our series on service animals.  In the first three installments, we discussed what service animals are, the rules governing service animals in public accommodations, and how the Fair Housing Act determines if service animals must be accommodated in housing.

Today, we will examine the rules for service animals and airline travel.

The pertinent law we will be looking at is the Air Carrier Access Act (ACAA) of 19861)the act dictates that the Department of Transportation [DOT] must promulgate rules for the airlines to following regarding disabled customers. The DOT published these regulations in 1990.

 

The Rules for Service Animals as Determined by the Department of Transportation

Subsection 382.55 of Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) dictate the rules for service animals during air travel. Unlike the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the ACAA permits both service animals and emotional support animals to fly with their owners; yet, the airlines are permitted to require documentation for emotional support animals.

Also, as opposed to the ADA that requires service animals to be dogs in most cases, many different types of animals may qualify as emotional support or service animals2)the DOT explicitly cites cats and monkeys as permissible, and snakes, spiders and ferrets as non-permissible.

The law states in pertinent part:

(a) Carriers shall permit dogs and other service animals used by persons with a disability to accompany the persons on a flight.

(1) Carriers shall accept as evidence that an animal is a service animal identification cards, other written documentation, presence of harnesses or markings on harnesses, tags, or the credible verbal assurances of the qualified individual with a disability using the animal.

(2) Carriers shall permit a service animal to accompany a qualified individual with a disability in any seat in which the person sits, unless the animal obstructs an aisle or other area that must remain unobstructed in order to facilitate an emergency evacuation.

 

Note in subpart 1 the conjunction “or”; as in, the airline’s employees shall accept written documentation or credible verbal assurances.

The DOT provides guidance on what the rule means by “or”3)as written by Samuel Podberesky, Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings, 15 July 2005.

Here are the relevant paragraphs:

 

Request documentation for service animals other than emotional support animals: The law allows airline personnel to ask for documentation as a means of verifying that the animal is a service animal, but DOT urges carriers not to require documentation as a condition for permitting an individual to travel with his or her service animal in the cabin unless a passenger’s verbal assurance is not credible.  In that case, the airline may require documentation as a condition for allowing the animal to travel in the cabin.  The purpose of documentation is to substantiate the passenger’s disability-related need for the animal’s accompaniment, which the airline may require as a condition to permit the animal to travel in the cabin.  Examples of documentation include a letter from a licensed professional treating the passenger’s condition (e.g., physician, mental health professional, vocational case manager, etc.)

Require documentation for emotional support animals:  With respect to an animal used for emotional support (which need not have specific training for that function), airline personnel may require current documentation (i.e., not more than one year old) on letterhead from a mental health professional stating

 (1) that the passenger has a mental health-related disability;

(2) that having the animal accompany the passenger is necessary to the passenger’s mental health or treatment or to assist the passenger (with his or her disability); and

(3) that the individual providing the assessment of the passenger is a licensed mental health professional and the passenger is under his or her professional care.

 Airline personnel may require this documentation as a condition of permitting the animal to accompany the passenger in the cabin.  The purpose of this provision is to prevent abuse by passengers that do not have a medical need for an emotional support animal and to ensure that passengers who have a legitimate need for emotional support animals are permitted to travel with their service animals on the aircraft.  Airlines are not permitted to require the documentation to specify the type of mental health disability, e.g., panic attacks.

 

For service animals, the DOT “urges” airline employees not to require documentation, but they still “may require” documentation if the verbal assurances from the passenger are not credible.4)Additionally, the DOT requires that the evaluation of the verbal assurances be done in “good faith”.

For emotional support animals the DOT requires written documentation from a mental health provider to “prevent abuse.”  For either type of animal companion, having written documentation with you will likely make the trip smoother for all of the parties involved.

 

When an Airplane is Permitted to Reject Service Animals

Similar to the ADA and the Fair Housing Act, airlines are not required to make accommodations that would create an “undue burden” or “fundamentally alter” the character of their business.  The DOT provides examples of what an “undue burden” might be:

  • Asking another passenger to give up the space in front of his or her seat to accommodate a service animal;

  • Denying transportation to any individual on a flight in order to provide an accommodation to a passenger with a service animal;

  • Furnishing more than one seat per ticket; and

  • Providing a seat in a class of service other than the one the passenger has purchased.

 

But what happens if an airline denies the right of a disabled person to bring along a service or emotional support animal?

Each airline is required to have a Complaint Resolution Official (CRO) available to assist during all business hours.

If there is a dispute about a service animal, request to speak to the CRO5)either in person or over the phone.  The CRO should have the authority to make the final determination regarding a service animal6)or any other complaint regarding discrimination based on a disability.

If the request is rejected, the CRO has ten days to provide a written explanation why this is so.

For folks traveling with service animals, the DOT recommends requesting a preferred seat 24 hours in advance takeoff and checking-in at least an hour before scheduled departure.

Even if this is not done, the airlines are required to accommodate the request to the best of their ability.

Providing advance notice may reduce the hassle and stress.

Footnotes

Footnotes
1 the act dictates that the Department of Transportation [DOT] must promulgate rules for the airlines to following regarding disabled customers. The DOT published these regulations in 1990
2 the DOT explicitly cites cats and monkeys as permissible, and snakes, spiders and ferrets as non-permissible
3 as written by Samuel Podberesky, Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings, 15 July 2005
4 Additionally, the DOT requires that the evaluation of the verbal assurances be done in “good faith”
5 either in person or over the phone
6 or any other complaint regarding discrimination based on a disability
motorcycle accident, personal injury, motorcycle accidents

Motorcycle Accident Liability

 

Have you, or do you know someone who has been in a motorcycle accident? If so, you likely desire a bit more information about how liability is assigned under Nevada law.

In a motorcycle accident, liability is determined by a negligence standard.  Both car and motorcycle drivers have a duty to drive with due care.  The Nevada legislature has codified the specific duties for motorcyclists; they are as follows:

    NRS486.331  Rights and duties of drivers.  

A person driving a motorcycle or moped upon a highway is entitled to all the rights and subject to all the duties applicable to the drivers of motor vehicles as provided by law, except those provisions which by their nature can have no application.   (Added to NRS by 1971, 1470; A 1975, 1084)

 

      NRS 486.341  Right to full use of traffic lane.  

Every motorcycle or moped when being driven on the highway is entitled to full use of the traffic lane it is occupying, and a person shall not drive another motor vehicle in a manner which would deprive any such motorcycle or moped of such use.   (Added to NRS by 1971, 1470; A 1975, 1084)

 

      NRS 486.351  Unlawful passing; driving abreast.

      1.  A person, except a police officer in the performance of his or her duty, shall not drive a motorcycle or moped between moving or stationary vehicles occupying adjacent traffic lanes.

      2.  Except as provided in subsection 3, a person shall not drive a motorcycle, moped or trimobile abreast of or overtake or pass another vehicle within the same traffic lane.

      3.  Motorcycles and mopeds may, with the consent of the drivers, be operated no more than two abreast in a single traffic lane.  (Added to NRS by 1971, 1470; A 1975, 1084; 1979, 857)

 

Why do these statutes matter? Because in determining liability in a motorcycle accident (hypothetically between the motorcyclist and an automobile driver), a judge or jury will evaluate if each party exercised the required due care.

 

How the NRS applies to a motorcycle accident

This is even true if automobile caused the accident in our hypothetical example.  Nevada uses what is called a modified comparative negligence standard.  Under this standard, even if the accident is caused by the automobile driver, the liability will be discounted by the percentage fault of the motorcyclist.  For example, a jury determines the automobile driver to be at fault, but the motorcyclist was driving faster than consider safe, they may assign 75% of the liability to the automobile driver and 25% to the motorcyclist.  The damages award will be then discounted accordingly.

Unlike your run-of-the-mill negligence cases where due care is determined based on how a “reasonable person” would act, much of the due care required by motorcyclists is explicit in the law as shown above.  Under the first two statutes listed, motorcycle drivers are said to have the same rights to the road as those driving cars, meaning that motorcycle drivers do not need to yield to drivers under all circumstances, but motorcyclists and automobile drivers are to treat one another as equals on the road.

NRS 486.351 elaborates on the specific duties, and exceptions, for motorcycle drivers.  Lane splitting (driving in between two cars on the white demarcation), is expressly prohibited by subsection one.  Subsection two prohibits motorcyclists from passing a car within the same lane.  Subsection three allows motorcyclists to share a lane as they drive, but only two motorcycles may share any one lane.

These laws are important to keep in mind because, as a motorcyclist, if you are in violation, it may be very difficult to recover for an accident injury.  This, unfortunately, may even be the case if automobile driver caused the accident.

service animal, service dog, special needs, ADA, emotional support animal,

The Fair Housing Act and a Service Animal

In Part I and Part II of our series talking about a service animal, we discussed the rights and regulations dictated in the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).  Our previous posts established what a service animal is under federal law, and what the responsibilities and duties owners of public accommodations owe to disabled folks under the ADA.

Beyond public accommodations, there is additional federal law that regulates landlords’ acceptance of service animals and emotional support animals in public and private housing.  The two federal laws to know in addition to the ADA are the Fair Housing Amendments Act (FHAct) of 19881)This act amends Title VIII of the 1968 Civil Rights Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Section 504).

 

 Content of the Fair Housing Amendments Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act with respect to a service animal

The pertinent parts of each of these federal laws contain similar measures.  Section 504 is applicable to any program that accepts government funds to help pay for subsidized or public housing 2)this does not include landlords that only accept money for Section 8 rental assistance.  The FHAct applies to almost all other types of housing.  The only landlords exempt from the FHAct are:

  1. Buildings with four or less units in which the landlord occupies one of the units
  2. Single-family dwellings sold or rented without the assistance of a real estate broker
  3. Hotel and motels3)though each of these are still subject to the ADA
  4. Private clubs

Under the FHAct and Section 504, the landlord shall permit a service animal or an emotional support animal if:

  1. The tenant has a disability
  2. The landlord is aware of the disability
  3. Reasonable accommodation is necessary for the tenant in question to have an equal opportunity to use and enjoy the dwelling like anyone else
  4. Accommodating the animal request would not constitute an undue burden on the landlord or fundamentally alter the premises

We will discuss each of these elements in turn.

 

What is a disability with respect to housing?

If (unfortunately) a tenant must pursue legal action in order for a landlord to accommodate his or her reasonable request, the court is going to demand proof of the disability.  Simply being disabled is not sufficient.  Unlike the ADA’s rules governing public accommodations, mental disabilities that require emotional support from an animal are covered by the FHAct and Section 5044)recall the difference under the ADA for emotional support animals [not covered] and psychiatric service dogs [used by folks with PTSD, for example, that are covered].  The FHAct and Section 504 are broader in scope, which is reasonable.

An important distinction between an ADA service animal, and the emotional support animal under FHAct and Section 504, is that an ADA service animal usually has to be a dog, where many other species can qualify as emotional support animals.

 

Landlord Awareness

A tenant may not unilaterally violate the terms of his or her lease because a disability exists.  S/he must request the reasonable accommodation in writing, along with a note from his or her doctor or mental health provider.  The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) advises that landlords consider the follow inquiry once receiving a reasonable accommodation request:

Does the person seeking to use and live with the animal have a disability — i.e., a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities?

Does the person making the request have a disability-related need for an assistance animal? In other words, does the animal work, provide assistance, perform tasks or services for the benefit of a person with a disability, or provide emotional support that alleviates one or more of the identified symptoms or effects of a person's existing disability?5)See HUD Rules for more information

 

Note that the tenant does not need to provide proof that the animal is properly trained or certified6)in fact it is illegal for a landlord to make such a request.

 

Reasonable Accommodation

This factor of the test considers if it is reasonable for a tenant to need an emotional support animal to have the equal opportunity to live and enjoy accommodations as much as someone could who does not have the disability in question.  Case law has established that permitting an emotional support animal is a reasonable accommodation under the FHAct and Section 504 7)see the oft cited Majors v. Housing Authority of the County of DeKalb, Georgia (652 F.2d 454 (5th Cir. 1981) for an example.

 

Undue Burden

This is a difficult element to prove for a landlord that desires to deny an emotional support or service animal to a requesting tenant.  It is not an undue burden under law for a landlord to have to spend a little more money to accommodate the tenant8)This is considered part of the cost of doing business by Congress.  The most common undue burden is when the service or emotional support animal harasses or disturbs other tenants; in these scenarios, it is possible that a landlord could validly evict the tenant with the disruptive animal.

Additionally, a landlord may not charge a higher deposit than normal for a service or emotional support animal, as they are not considered pets by federal law.  Yet if the animal causes damage to the property, the tenant may be held liable.

 

Stay tuned for part IV of our series on airplane travel and service animals.

Footnotes

Footnotes
1 This act amends Title VIII of the 1968 Civil Rights Act
2 this does not include landlords that only accept money for Section 8 rental assistance
3 though each of these are still subject to the ADA
4 recall the difference under the ADA for emotional support animals [not covered] and psychiatric service dogs [used by folks with PTSD, for example, that are covered]
5 See HUD Rules for more information
6 in fact it is illegal for a landlord to make such a request
7 see the oft cited Majors v. Housing Authority of the County of DeKalb, Georgia (652 F.2d 454 (5th Cir. 1981) for an example
8 This is considered part of the cost of doing business by Congress
Clear Counsel Law group

Contact Info

1671 W Horizon Ridge Pkwy Suite 200,
Henderson, NV 89012

+1 702 522 0696
info@clearcounsel.com

Daily: 9:00 am - 5:00 pm
Saturday & Sunday: By Appointment Only

Copyright 2019 Clear Counsel Law Group® | Nav Map

Nothing on this site is legal advice.